ISO 20252:2006 Certification

/ ISO 20252:2006 Certification, Iso Certificaiton / By

ISO 20252:2006 Certification Overview

Introduction

ISO 20252:2006 is an international standard that specifies the requirements for the quality management of market research, opinion polling, and social research. It provides a framework for organizations to ensure that their research processes are consistent, reliable, and of high quality, ultimately leading to valid and actionable insights for decision-making.

Purpose of ISO 20252:2006

The primary purpose of ISO 20252:2006 is to:

  • Establish a set of standardized practices that enhance the credibility and reliability of research outcomes.
  • Ensure that organizations involved in market research adhere to systematic quality management processes.
  • Provide stakeholders with confidence in the integrity of research findings.

Key Components of ISO 20252:2006 Certification

  1. Quality Management System (QMS)
    • Organizations must implement a QMS that meets the requirements outlined in the standard. This includes documenting processes, establishing quality objectives, and maintaining records to demonstrate compliance.
  2. Management Responsibility
    • Top management must be committed to the implementation and continuous improvement of the QMS. This includes assigning responsibilities, ensuring adequate resources, and promoting a quality-focused culture within the organization.
  3. Research Processes
    • The standard emphasizes the need for organizations to establish and maintain documented procedures for all stages of the research process, including:
      • Defining research objectives.
      • Designing research methodologies.
      • Data collection and analysis.
      • Reporting and presenting findings.
  4. Personnel Competence
    • Organizations must ensure that personnel involved in research activities possess the necessary qualifications, training, and experience to perform their roles effectively. This may include ongoing professional development and competency assessments.
  5. Client Communication
    • Effective communication with clients is essential throughout the research process. Organizations should ensure that client requirements are clearly understood and met, and that feedback is collected and acted upon.
  6. Data Management and Security
    • Proper management of data is critical to maintaining the integrity of research findings. The standard outlines requirements for data collection, storage, and protection to ensure confidentiality and compliance with relevant regulations.
  7. Quality Control and Assurance
    • Organizations must implement quality control measures to monitor the research process and identify areas for improvement. This may involve internal audits, peer reviews, and client feedback mechanisms.
  8. Continuous Improvement
    • ISO 20252:2006 promotes a culture of continuous improvement within organizations. Regular reviews of processes, performance, and client satisfaction should be conducted to identify opportunities for enhancement.

Benefits of ISO 20252:2006 Certification

  • Enhanced Credibility: Certification demonstrates an organization’s commitment to quality, enhancing its credibility and reputation among clients and stakeholders.
  • Improved Quality of Research: Adhering to standardized processes leads to more reliable and valid research findings, which can inform better decision-making.
  • Increased Client Satisfaction: A focus on quality management and client communication results in improved client satisfaction and long-term partnerships.
  • Competitive Advantage: Certification can provide a competitive edge in the marketplace, differentiating certified organizations from their non-certified counterparts.

Who Should Consider ISO 20252:2006 Certification?

Organizations involved in market research, opinion polling, and social research, including:

  • Market research agencies
  • Social research organizations
  • Academic institutions conducting research
  • Corporate research departments

Implementation Steps for Certification

  1. Gap Analysis: Conduct an initial assessment to identify existing practices and gaps in relation to ISO 20252:2006 requirements.
  2. Develop a QMS: Create or enhance the organization’s quality management system, documenting procedures and establishing quality objectives.
  3. Training and Awareness: Train staff on the requirements of the standard and the importance of quality management in research.
  4. Internal Audits: Implement internal audits to assess compliance with the QMS and identify areas for improvement.
  5. Management Review: Conduct management reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of the QMS and determine necessary actions for improvement.
  6. Certification Audit: Engage an accredited certification body to conduct the certification audit and assess compliance with ISO 20252:2006.
  7. Continuous Improvement: After certification, organizations should focus on maintaining and improving their QMS to sustain compliance and enhance research quality.

Conclusion

ISO 20252:2006 certification is a valuable asset for organizations involved in market research and social research, providing a structured approach to quality management. By adhering to this standard, organizations can enhance their credibility, improve research quality, and ensure client satisfaction, ultimately leading to better research outcomes and decision-making.

Organizations considering certification should take a systematic approach to implement the standard, ensuring ongoing commitment to quality and continuous improvement.

What is required ISO 20252:2006 Certification

ISO 20252:2006 is an international standard that outlines the requirements for a quality management system (QMS) in the field of market, opinion, and social research. The certification signifies that an organization has established a systematic approach to ensuring the quality of its research processes and outcomes. Below are the key requirements of ISO 20252:2006 Certification:

Key Requirements of ISO 20252:2006 Certification

  1. Quality Management System (QMS)
    • Organizations must develop, implement, and maintain a documented QMS that meets the requirements of ISO 20252:2006. This includes establishing quality policies, objectives, and procedures to ensure consistency and reliability in research activities.
  2. Management Responsibility
    • Top management must demonstrate commitment to the QMS, including:
      • Ensuring the QMS is effectively implemented and maintained.
      • Assigning responsibilities and resources for quality management.
      • Promoting a quality-focused culture within the organization.
  3. Research Process Control
    • Organizations must document and control all stages of the research process, including:
      • Defining research objectives.
      • Designing appropriate methodologies.
      • Conducting data collection and analysis.
      • Reporting findings to clients.
  4. Personnel Competence
    • Staff involved in research activities must possess the necessary qualifications, training, and experience. Organizations should implement training programs and competency assessments to ensure personnel are equipped to perform their roles effectively.
  5. Client Communication
    • Effective communication with clients is crucial. Organizations must establish processes to understand and meet client requirements, as well as to collect feedback for continuous improvement.
  6. Data Management and Security
    • Proper management of data is essential to maintain the integrity of research. Organizations must implement procedures for data collection, storage, security, and confidentiality in compliance with relevant regulations.
  7. Quality Control and Assurance
    • Organizations must implement quality control measures, such as regular audits and peer reviews, to monitor research processes and identify areas for improvement.
  8. Documented Information
    • Organizations must maintain appropriate documentation, including policies, procedures, records, and reports, to demonstrate compliance with the standard and to facilitate internal audits.
  9. Continuous Improvement
    • A focus on continuous improvement is essential. Organizations should regularly review their QMS, performance, and client feedback to identify and implement improvements.
  10. Internal Audits
    • Conduct internal audits to assess the effectiveness of the QMS and ensure compliance with ISO 20252:2006. These audits help identify areas needing improvement and verify that the organization is meeting its quality objectives.
  11. Management Review
    • Top management must regularly review the QMS to evaluate its effectiveness, identify opportunities for improvement, and ensure it aligns with the organization’s strategic direction.

Conclusion

ISO 20252:2006 Certification requires organizations involved in market, opinion, and social research to implement a robust quality management system that ensures the reliability and validity of their research findings. By meeting these requirements, organizations can enhance their credibility, improve client satisfaction, and achieve better research outcomes.

Who is required ISO 20252:2006 Certification

ISO 20252:2006 Certification is relevant for organizations involved in market research, opinion polling, and social research. Here are the specific types of entities that typically require this certification:

1. Market Research Agencies

  • Organizations that conduct market research to gather data on consumer preferences, market trends, and competitive analysis.

2. Opinion Polling Firms

  • Companies that carry out opinion polls to gauge public sentiment on various issues, including political opinions, social issues, and consumer preferences.

3. Social Research Organizations

  • Institutions or organizations that conduct research focused on social issues, public policy, and community studies to gather insights and inform decision-making.

4. Corporate Research Departments

  • Departments within corporations that conduct internal research to understand market dynamics, consumer behavior, and product development.

5. Academic Institutions

  • Universities and research institutions that conduct research in the fields of social sciences, market behavior, and public opinion studies.

6. Consulting Firms

  • Firms that provide consulting services based on research data to help clients make informed business decisions.

7. Government Agencies

  • Government bodies that conduct research for policy development, program evaluation, and public administration.

8. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)

  • NGOs that conduct social research to inform their initiatives, programs, and advocacy efforts.

9. Data Collection and Analysis Service Providers

  • Organizations specializing in data collection, statistical analysis, and reporting for research projects.

Conclusion

ISO 20252:2006 Certification is required for any organization involved in the systematic collection and analysis of data to ensure the quality, reliability, and validity of research outcomes. By obtaining this certification, these organizations can demonstrate their commitment to quality management, enhance their credibility, and improve client trust in their research findings.

When is required ISO 20252:2006 Certification

ISO 20252:2006 Certification is required under various circumstances, primarily related to the quality management of market, opinion, and social research. Here are key scenarios when organizations might seek this certification:

1. Market Entry

  • New Research Firms: New organizations entering the market may seek ISO 20252:2006 Certification to establish credibility and demonstrate their commitment to quality from the outset.

2. Client Requirements

  • Client Demands: Clients, especially large corporations or government entities, may require their research suppliers to be ISO 20252 certified to ensure the quality and reliability of the research conducted.

3. Competitive Advantage

  • Differentiation: Organizations may pursue certification to differentiate themselves in a competitive market, showcasing their commitment to high-quality research standards.

4. Regulatory Compliance

  • Legal and Regulatory Standards: In some jurisdictions or industries, compliance with certain quality management standards may be required for conducting specific types of research, making certification essential.

5. Quality Assurance Programs

  • Enhancing Internal Processes: Organizations looking to improve their internal quality assurance programs may implement ISO 20252:2006 as a framework for continuous improvement in research quality.

6. Reputation Management

  • Building Trust: Obtaining certification can help organizations build trust with clients and stakeholders, reinforcing their reputation for conducting high-quality research.

7. Operational Efficiency

  • Streamlining Processes: Certification may be pursued as part of an initiative to streamline research processes, improve efficiency, and reduce errors in data collection and analysis.

8. Access to Funding

  • Grant Applications: Research organizations applying for grants or funding may need to demonstrate compliance with recognized standards like ISO 20252:2006 to qualify.

9. International Recognition

  • Global Operations: Organizations operating in multiple countries may seek certification to meet international standards, facilitating smoother operations and credibility across borders.

Conclusion

Organizations require ISO 20252:2006 Certification when they aim to establish a systematic approach to managing the quality of their research activities, meet client demands, comply with regulatory standards, and enhance their market competitiveness. The certification serves as a formal acknowledgment of their commitment to quality management in the field of market, opinion, and social research.

Where is required ISO 20252:2006 Certification

ISO 20252:2006 Certification is required in various contexts related to market, opinion, and social research. Here are some key areas and locations where this certification is typically needed:

1. Market Research Agencies

  • Industry-Wide: Agencies conducting market research to gather consumer insights, product feedback, and market trends will benefit from certification to ensure compliance with quality standards.

2. Opinion Polling Organizations

  • Public Sector and Media: Organizations that conduct public opinion polls for political campaigns, social issues, or media reporting may require certification to validate their research methodologies.

3. Social Research Institutions

  • Academia and NGOs: Research institutions and non-governmental organizations involved in social research to inform public policy or community programs will often pursue certification to ensure the quality and credibility of their research.

4. Corporate Research Departments

  • Private Sector: Corporations that conduct internal market research, consumer behavior studies, or employee satisfaction surveys may implement ISO 20252:2006 to standardize their research processes.

5. Government Agencies

  • Policy Development: Government bodies involved in conducting research to inform policies, programs, and community services may require this certification to validate their research quality.

6. Consulting Firms

  • Strategic Research: Consulting firms that offer data-driven insights and strategic recommendations based on research findings may pursue certification to enhance their credibility with clients.

7. Data Collection Services

  • Fieldwork and Analysis Providers: Companies that specialize in data collection, survey administration, and statistical analysis often seek certification to assure clients of the quality and reliability of their services.

8. International Organizations

  • Global Research Initiatives: Organizations involved in international research projects, such as those conducted by global NGOs or multi-national corporations, may require certification to align with international quality standards.

9. Conferences and Events

  • Industry Events: Organizations presenting research findings at industry conferences may need to demonstrate their adherence to ISO 20252:2006 to establish credibility with peers and stakeholders.

10. Grant-Funded Projects

  • Research Funding Bodies: Organizations seeking funding from governmental or private grant-making bodies may be required to have ISO 20252:2006 Certification as a condition for funding.

Conclusion

ISO 20252:2006 Certification is required in various sectors that engage in market, opinion, and social research. By obtaining this certification, organizations can enhance their credibility, ensure compliance with quality standards, and improve the reliability and validity of their research outcomes across multiple contexts.

How is required ISO 20252:2006 Certification

o obtain ISO 20252:2006 Certification, organizations must follow a systematic process that involves several key steps. Here’s an overview of how organizations can achieve this certification:

1. Understand the Standard

  • Familiarization: Organizations should thoroughly understand the requirements outlined in ISO 20252:2006, including its principles of quality management specific to market, opinion, and social research.

2. Assess Current Practices

  • Gap Analysis: Conduct a gap analysis to compare current practices against the requirements of the standard. Identify areas that need improvement to meet the ISO criteria.

3. Develop a Quality Management System (QMS)

  • Implementation: Establish and document a quality management system tailored to the specific processes of market research. This may include:
    • Defining organizational structure and roles.
    • Documenting processes for data collection, analysis, and reporting.
    • Establishing protocols for client communication and feedback.

4. Training and Awareness

  • Staff Training: Provide training for staff to ensure they understand the QMS, the importance of compliance with ISO standards, and their specific roles within the system.
  • Awareness Programs: Conduct awareness programs to foster a culture of quality within the organization.

5. Conduct Internal Audits

  • Self-Assessment: Perform internal audits to evaluate compliance with the QMS and the ISO standard. This helps identify any deficiencies and areas for further improvement.

6. Management Review

  • Review Process: Conduct a management review of the QMS to assess its effectiveness and alignment with ISO 20252:2006. Make necessary adjustments based on audit findings and management feedback.

7. Select a Certification Body

  • Certification Body Selection: Choose an accredited certification body that specializes in ISO certifications. Ensure that the chosen body has a good reputation and experience in your industry.

8. Certification Audit

  • External Audit: The certification body will conduct an external audit to evaluate the organization’s compliance with ISO 20252:2006. This typically involves:
    • Document reviews.
    • Interviews with staff.
    • Observation of processes.
  • Audit Report: Following the audit, the certification body will provide a report detailing their findings, including any non-conformities that need to be addressed.

9. Corrective Actions

  • Address Non-Conformities: If any non-conformities are identified, the organization must take corrective actions and provide evidence of these actions to the certification body.

10. Certification Decision

  • Approval: Upon successful completion of the audit and addressing any non-conformities, the certification body will issue the ISO 20252:2006 Certification.

11. Ongoing Compliance

  • Continuous Improvement: Organizations must maintain their QMS and continually improve processes to ensure ongoing compliance with the standard.
  • Surveillance Audits: The certification body will conduct regular surveillance audits to ensure continued adherence to ISO 20252:2006.

Conclusion

Achieving ISO 20252:2006 Certification involves a structured approach to implementing a quality management system that meets the standard’s requirements. By following these steps, organizations can enhance their research quality, improve operational efficiency, and gain credibility in the market.

Case Study on ISO 20252:2006 Certification

Case Study: Implementation of ISO 20252:2006 Certification at Market Research Solutions (MRS)

Background

Market Research Solutions (MRS) is a mid-sized market research agency specializing in consumer insights and market analysis for various industries. Established in 2005, MRS has gained a reputation for delivering high-quality research services but faced challenges in standardizing processes and ensuring consistent quality across projects. To enhance their credibility and improve operational efficiency, MRS decided to pursue ISO 20252:2006 Certification.

Objectives

  • Standardization: Establish standardized processes for research methodologies to ensure consistency in data collection and analysis.
  • Quality Improvement: Enhance the quality of research outputs and increase client satisfaction.
  • Market Differentiation: Gain a competitive edge in the market by showcasing a commitment to quality through ISO certification.

Implementation Steps

  1. Gap Analysis
    • MRS conducted a thorough gap analysis to assess current practices against the requirements of ISO 20252:2006. This involved reviewing existing processes, documentation, and compliance levels.
    • The analysis revealed inconsistencies in data collection methods, documentation practices, and reporting formats.
  2. Developing a Quality Management System (QMS)
    • Based on the findings from the gap analysis, MRS developed a comprehensive QMS that included:
      • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for data collection, analysis, and reporting.
      • A quality manual detailing the organization’s commitment to quality and adherence to ISO standards.
      • Templates for research proposals, questionnaires, and reports to ensure uniformity.
  3. Training and Awareness
    • MRS organized training sessions for all employees to familiarize them with the new QMS, emphasizing the importance of quality in research and compliance with ISO standards.
    • Regular workshops and awareness programs were conducted to instill a culture of quality within the organization.
  4. Internal Audits
    • MRS implemented a schedule for internal audits to evaluate the effectiveness of the QMS. These audits helped identify areas for improvement and ensured that processes were being followed consistently.
    • A feedback mechanism was established to encourage employees to report issues or suggest enhancements.
  5. Management Review
    • The management team conducted periodic reviews of the QMS to assess its performance and alignment with ISO 20252:2006 requirements. This involved analyzing audit results, client feedback, and research outcomes.
  6. Certification Audit
    • After six months of implementing the QMS, MRS engaged an accredited certification body to conduct the external audit for ISO 20252:2006 Certification.
    • The audit included document reviews, interviews with staff, and observations of research processes.
  7. Achieving Certification
    • MRS successfully passed the certification audit, receiving ISO 20252:2006 Certification. The certification body commended MRS for its commitment to quality and the effectiveness of its QMS.

Results

  • Improved Research Quality: MRS experienced a notable improvement in the quality and consistency of research outputs, leading to higher client satisfaction ratings.
  • Enhanced Efficiency: Standardized processes reduced time spent on project management and allowed teams to focus more on analysis and insights.
  • Market Differentiation: The ISO certification became a key selling point for MRS, attracting new clients and retaining existing ones.
  • Continuous Improvement: The organization embraced a culture of continuous improvement, regularly reviewing and updating its processes based on feedback and changing industry standards.

Conclusion

The successful implementation of ISO 20252:2006 Certification at Market Research Solutions not only enhanced their operational efficiency and research quality but also positioned them as a leader in the market research industry. The certification process encouraged a commitment to excellence and continuous improvement, ensuring that MRS remains competitive and responsive to client needs.

White Paper on ISO 20252:2006 Certification

Executive Summary

ISO 20252:2006 is an international standard that outlines requirements for quality management systems specifically tailored for market, opinion, and social research organizations. Achieving ISO 20252 certification signifies a commitment to quality, consistency, and reliability in research practices. This white paper discusses the importance of ISO 20252:2006, its requirements, the certification process, and the benefits for organizations pursuing this standard.

Introduction

In an increasingly competitive landscape, market research organizations must demonstrate their commitment to quality and integrity in their processes. ISO 20252:2006 provides a framework for establishing a quality management system (QMS) that ensures consistency in research methodologies, data collection, and reporting. Certification to this standard not only enhances an organization’s credibility but also instills confidence among clients regarding the reliability of research outcomes.

Importance of ISO 20252:2006 Certification

1. Quality Assurance

ISO 20252:2006 focuses on maintaining high-quality standards in all aspects of market research. By adhering to the standard, organizations can ensure the validity and reliability of their research findings.

2. Client Confidence

Achieving certification demonstrates to clients that the organization is committed to best practices in research. This builds trust and enhances the organization’s reputation in the marketplace.

3. Process Standardization

The standard encourages organizations to document and standardize their research processes, leading to more efficient operations and consistent outcomes across projects.

4. Continuous Improvement

ISO 20252:2006 promotes a culture of continuous improvement, where organizations regularly assess and refine their processes based on feedback, audits, and changing market needs.

Key Requirements of ISO 20252:2006

1. Quality Management System (QMS)

Organizations must establish, document, implement, and maintain a QMS that meets the requirements of the standard.

2. Management Responsibility

Top management is responsible for ensuring the QMS is effectively implemented and maintained. This includes allocating resources and supporting continuous improvement initiatives.

3. Resource Management

Organizations must ensure that they have the necessary resources, including trained personnel and adequate infrastructure, to effectively conduct research activities.

4. Research Processes

The standard requires organizations to document and standardize their research processes, including planning, data collection, analysis, and reporting.

5. Client Communication

Effective communication with clients is essential for understanding their needs and expectations. The organization must have processes in place for managing client relationships and feedback.

6. Monitoring and Measurement

Organizations must implement processes for monitoring and measuring the performance of their QMS and research outcomes, enabling them to identify areas for improvement.

The Certification Process

1. Preparation

Organizations should begin by conducting a gap analysis to assess current practices against the requirements of ISO 20252:2006. This helps identify areas that need improvement.

2. Developing a QMS

Based on the gap analysis, organizations must develop a comprehensive QMS that includes documented processes, procedures, and policies.

3. Training and Awareness

Employees should receive training on the QMS and the importance of compliance with ISO standards. Creating a culture of quality within the organization is crucial for successful implementation.

4. Internal Audits

Conducting internal audits helps organizations evaluate the effectiveness of their QMS and identify areas for improvement before the external certification audit.

5. Engagement with a Certification Body

Organizations should select an accredited certification body to conduct the external audit. The certification body will assess compliance with ISO 20252:2006 and provide feedback on areas for improvement.

6. Corrective Actions

If non-conformities are identified during the audit, organizations must take corrective actions to address them and provide evidence of these actions to the certification body.

7. Achieving Certification

Upon successful completion of the audit and resolution of any non-conformities, the certification body will issue ISO 20252:2006 Certification.

Benefits of ISO 20252:2006 Certification

1. Enhanced Credibility

Certification establishes the organization as a reputable provider of market research services, leading to increased client trust and loyalty.

2. Improved Operational Efficiency

Standardized processes reduce redundancies and enhance productivity, enabling organizations to deliver results more efficiently.

3. Increased Client Satisfaction

A commitment to quality and reliability translates to higher levels of client satisfaction, fostering long-term relationships and repeat business.

4. Market Competitiveness

ISO certification provides a competitive advantage, helping organizations differentiate themselves in a crowded marketplace.

Conclusion

ISO 20252:2006 Certification represents a significant investment in quality management for market research organizations. By adhering to the standard’s requirements, organizations can enhance their credibility, improve operational efficiency, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. In an environment where data integrity and research quality are paramount, achieving ISO 20252:2006 Certification is a strategic move that positions organizations for long-term success.

  1. “Academy of Management Review”. AOM_CMS. Retrieved 2022-06-03.
  2. ^ “Academy of Management Review”. 2023 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Science ed.). Clarivate Analytics. 2023.
  3. ^ “Kris Byron Named Editor-in-Chief of Academy of Management Review – Georgia State University News – Faculty/Research, Press Releases, Robinson College of Business”. Georgia State News Hub. 2023-03-30. Retrieved 2023-05-26.
  4. ^ “Editorial Board”. Retrieved 2022-06-18.
  5. ^ “Academy of Management Review”. MIAR: Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals. University of Barcelona. Retrieved 2022-06-18.
  6. ^ “Search by Journal, University, Author and Article – the UTD Top 100 Business School Research Rankings”.
  7. ^ “50 Journals used in FT Research Rank”. Financial Times. 2012-02-22. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
  8. Campbell Robertson (August 1, 2006). “Nielsen Brings a New Marketing Strategy to Broadway”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  9. ^ McQuarrie, Edward (2005). The market research toolbox: a concise guide for beginners (2nd ed.). SAGE. ISBN 978-1-4129-1319-5. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  10. ^ International Code on Market and Social Research (PDF) (4 ed.). ICC/ESOMAR Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 3, 2018. Retrieved December 29, 2009.
  11. ^ “Commercial Item Handbook” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2020. market research is a business operation
  12. ^ Alex Burke (17 December 2011). “What Is Formulated Marketing?”. Hearst Newspapers. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved August 2, 2020. Marketing is a business process that ..
  13. ^ Susan J. Hart; John R. Webb; Marian V. Jones (1994). “Export Marketing Research and the Effect of Export Experience in Industrial SMEs”. International Marketing Review. 11 (6): 18. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.461.857. doi:10.1108/02651339410072980. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved August 28, 2022. Size of firm seems to be related to the use of informal market research
  14. ^ Lockley, Lawrence C. (1950). “Notes on the History of Marketing Research”. Journal of Marketing. 14 (5): 733–736. doi:10.2307/1246952. JSTOR 1246952. Archived from the original on August 16, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  15. ^ McDonald, Malcolm (2007). Marketing Plans (6th ed.). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-7506-8386-9. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  16. ^ “Market Research END-TO-END Benefits”. September 6, 2014. Archived from the original on August 21, 2021. Retrieved July 23, 2020. Because Market Research is a subset of Marketing Research, it is easy to see why the two terms are often confused.
  17. ^ Claessens, Maximilian (January 9, 2018). “Difference between Market Research and Marketing Research”. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  18. ^ “Difference Between Market & Marketing Research”. September 24, 2019. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020. Market Research is a subset of Marketing Research
  19. ^ “NAPCS Product List for NAICS 54191: Marketing Research” (PDF). United States Census. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 17, 2012. data collection services for marketing research and public opinion surveys, by methods other than … data collection services provided as part of a market research services package that includes
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuba Kierlanczyk (February 4, 2016). “A Brief History of Market Research”. Kelton Global. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  21. ^ Lisa Belkin (March 6, 1990). “Gallup Shifts Emphasis Toward Market Studies”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  22. ^ Drucker, Peter F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Australia: Harper & Row. pp. 64–65. ISBN 0-06-011092-9. There will always, one can assume, be need for some selling. But the aim of marketing is to make selling superfluous. The aim of marketing is to know and understand the customer so well that the product or service fits him and sells itself. Ideally, marketing should result in a customer who is ready to buy. All that should be needed then is to make the product or service available…
  23. ^ Diaz Ruiz, C. A. (2013). “Assembling Market Representations”. Marketing Theory. 13 (3): 245–261. doi:10.1177/1470593113487744. S2CID 220080576.
  24. ^ Carol Vogel (December 20, 1992). “Dear Museumgoer: What Do You Think?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  25. ^ John McDonough; Karen Egolf (2015). The Advertising Age Encyclopedia of Advertising.
  26. ^ Espinoza, Fredrik; Hamfors, Ola; Karlgren, Jussi; Olsson, Fredrik; Hamberg, Lars; Sahlgren, Magnus (2018). “Analysis of Open Answers to Survey Questions through Interactive Clustering and Theme Extraction”. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval – CHIIR ’18. pp. 317–320. doi:10.1145/3176349.3176892. ISBN 9781450349253. S2CID 3619476. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  27. ^ “When Data Science and Traditional Market Research Collide”. MarketCast. November 24, 2020. Archived from the original on December 4, 2021. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
  28. ^ Natasha Singer (November 2, 2019). “The Government Protects Our Food and Cars. Why Not Our Data?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020. because Congress has never established an agency to
  29. ^ Stuart Elliott (August 23, 1993). “The latest in market research: videogenic self-analyzing shoppers”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
  30. ^ Shira Ovide (July 21, 2020). “Beware the ‘But China’ Excuses”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020. it’s hard to know when to believe them.
  31. ^ Sandy Parakilas (November 19, 2017). “We Can’t Trust Facebook to Regulate Itself”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 11, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020. prioritized data collection over user protection and regulatory compliance
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b Sha, Mandy; Lai, Jennie (April 7, 2016). “A case study of improving and evaluating consumer survey translation”. Translation & Interpreting. 8 (1): 86–100. doi:10.12807/ti.108201.2016.a06. ISSN 1836-9324.
  33. ^ Sapna Maheshwari (November 28, 2019). “When Is a Star Not Always a Star? When It’s an Online Review”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 17, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020. Customer reviews are incredibly important in e-commerce, but they can be unreliable or downright dishonest.
  34. ^ “How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Drivers’ Buttons”. The New York Times. April 2, 2017. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved July 26, 2020. Faster pickup times mean more idle drivers … armies of underemployed people looking for extra hours
  35. ^ Karen Weise (December 19, 2019). “Prime Power: How Amazon Squeezes the Businesses Behind Its Store”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
  36. ^ Eric Pfanner (June 22, 2008). “Market research is getting a makeover”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b Philip H. Dougherty (November 16, 1975). “Market Research Is Now a National Pastime”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  38. ^ Geisen, Emily; Sha, Mandy; Roper, Farren (2024). Bias testing in market research: A framework to enable inclusive research design (published January 3, 2024). ISBN 979-8862902785.
  39. ^ Alan R. Andreasen (July 1983). “Cost-Conscious Marketing Research”. Harvard Business Review.
  40. ^ “E-commerce worldwide – statistics & facts”. Statista.
  41. ^ Drake, Philip (2008). McDonald & Wasko (ed.). Distribution and Marketing in Contemporary Hollywood. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 63–82. ISBN 978-1-4051-3388-3.
  42. ^ Jump up to:a b Diaz Ruiz, Carlos A. (March 20, 2022). “The Insights Industry: Towards a Performativity Turn in Market Research”. International Journal of Market Research. 64 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1177/14707853211039191. S2CID 238711288. Archived from the original on June 20, 2022. Retrieved June 20, 2022.
  43. ^ Diaz Ruiz, Carlos; Holmlund, Maria (October 2017). “Actionable marketing knowledge: A close reading of representation, knowledge and action in market research”. Industrial Marketing Management. 66: 172–180. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.005.
  44. ^ Graham Kenny (January 17, 2019). “Customer Surveys Are No Substitute for Actually Talking to Customers”. Harvard Business Review.
Translate »
× How can I help you?