ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification – Six Sigma Quality International

ISO 20957-1:2013 pertains to “Fitness equipment” and specifically covers the general safety requirements for fitness equipment designed for use in fitness centers, gyms, and similar facilities. This standard outlines the requirements to ensure the safety and functionality of fitness equipment, protecting both users and operators.

Overview of ISO 20957-1:2013

Purpose

The standard aims to ensure that fitness equipment is safe for use, which is essential for preventing accidents and injuries during exercise. It addresses various aspects, including design, construction, testing, and labeling of fitness equipment.

Scope

ISO 20957-1:2013 applies to all types of fitness equipment, including:

- Strength training machines

- Cardiovascular training equipment (e.g., treadmills, stationary bikes)

- Accessories (e.g., mats, benches)

Key Requirements

1. General Safety Requirements
  - - Equipment must be designed to minimize risks during normal use and foreseeable misuse.
  - - Safety measures must be integrated into the design, such as stability, strength, and proper functioning of mechanical components.
    - Testing and Compliance Equipment must undergo rigorous testing to ensure it meets safety and performance standards. This includes static and dynamic load testing, as well as tests for stability and durability.

1. - - Documentation demonstrating compliance with the standard must be maintained, including test results and manufacturer specifications.

1. Marking and Instructions
  - - Clear labeling is required on all equipment, indicating safe usage practices, potential hazards, and maintenance requirements.
  - - User manuals must provide comprehensive instructions on the correct use and maintenance of the equipment.

1. Quality Assurance
  - - Manufacturers must implement a quality management system to ensure ongoing compliance with the standard and to manage the risks associated with fitness equipment production.

Certification Process

To obtain ISO 20957-1:2013 certification, organizations typically follow these steps:

1. Gap analysis: Assess current practices against the requirements of ISO 20957-1:2013 to identify areas for improvement.

1. Implementation: Develop and implement necessary policies, procedures, and practices to comply with the standard.

1. Internal Audit: Conduct internal audits to evaluate compliance and effectiveness of implemented processes.

1. Certification Body Selection: Choose an accredited certification body to perform the certification audit.

1. Certification Audit: Undergo a certification audit, where the certification body reviews documentation, conducts interviews, and inspects the equipment to ensure compliance with the standard.

1. Certification Issuance: If successful, the organization receives an ISO 20957-1:2013 certification, demonstrating compliance with safety requirements for fitness equipment.

1. Ongoing Maintenance: Engage in continuous monitoring and improvement processes to maintain compliance and prepare for surveillance audits by the certification body.

Benefits of Certification

1. Enhanced Safety: Certification demonstrates a commitment to user safety and can reduce the risk of accidents and injuries.

1. Market Advantage: Being certified can differentiate a brand in the competitive fitness equipment market and attract safety-conscious customers.

1. Regulatory Compliance: Compliance with international safety standards can help organizations meet legal and regulatory requirements in various jurisdictions.

1. Consumer Trust: Certification builds consumer confidence in the safety and quality of fitness equipment, encouraging sales and brand loyalty.

Conclusion

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification provides essential guidelines for manufacturers and distributors of fitness equipment, ensuring safety and quality. By adhering to this standard, organizations can enhance their market presence while prioritizing user safety and satisfaction.

What is required ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification pertains to the safety and performance requirements for fitness equipment. Here’s a detailed breakdown of what is required for certification under this standard:

Key Requirements for ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

1. Scope Definition
  - - The organization must define the types of fitness equipment that will be covered by the certification, including cardiovascular machines, strength training equipment, and accessories.

1. General Safety Requirements
  - - Design Safety: Equipment must be designed to minimize risks. This includes considerations for stability, durability, and structural integrity.
  - - User Protection: Implement safeguards to protect users from potential hazards (e.g., pinch points, sharp edges).

1. Testing Requirements
  - - Static and Dynamic Testing: The equipment must undergo rigorous testing to verify that it can withstand specified loads without failure.
  - - Durability Testing: Long-term use scenarios must be simulated to ensure the equipment maintains performance over time.
  - - Safety Testing: Tests must be conducted to ensure the equipment operates safely under normal use conditions.

1. Documentation and Record-Keeping
  - - Maintain comprehensive documentation that includes:
      - Design specifications
      - Testing protocols and results
      - Risk assessments
      - User manuals and labeling information

1. User Instructions and Marking
  - - Clear Labeling: Equipment must have clear and visible safety labels that inform users about safe usage practices and potential risks.
  - - User Manuals: Provide detailed user manuals that outline proper usage, maintenance, and safety instructions.

1. Quality Management System (QMS)
  - - Implement a QMS that adheres to principles of continuous improvement and customer satisfaction. This system should monitor and manage compliance with the safety requirements of ISO 20957-1:2013.

1. Training and Competence
  - - Ensure that personnel involved in the design, manufacturing, and maintenance of the equipment are adequately trained and competent in safety practices and ISO requirements.

1. Internal Audits
  - - Regularly conduct internal audits to assess compliance with the standard and to identify areas for improvement.

1. External Certification Audit
  - - Choose an accredited certification body to perform the external audit. The audit will assess compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013 based on the documentation, equipment testing, and internal processes.

1. Corrective Actions
  - - Establish procedures to address non-conformities identified during audits and implement corrective actions as necessary to ensure ongoing compliance.

Process for Certification

1. Gap Analysis: Evaluate current practices against ISO 20957-1:2013 to identify areas needing improvement.

1. Implementation: Develop necessary processes and policies to meet the standard’s requirements.

1. Internal Audit: Perform audits to verify compliance and identify issues.

1. Select Certification Body: Choose an accredited body to conduct the certification audit.

1. Certification Audit: Undergo an external audit where compliance with the standard is assessed.

1. Certification Issuance: If compliant, receive ISO 20957-1:2013 certification.

1. Surveillance Audits: Engage in regular surveillance audits to maintain certification.

Conclusion

Obtaining ISO 20957-1:2013 certification demonstrates an organization’s commitment to producing safe and high-quality fitness equipment. Compliance with the standard not only enhances product safety and performance but also builds consumer trust and can lead to competitive advantages in the marketplace.

Who is required ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is required for various stakeholders involved in the design, manufacturing, and distribution of fitness equipment. The following entities are typically required to obtain this certification:

1. Manufacturers of Fitness Equipment

- Companies producing cardiovascular machines (e.g., treadmills, stationary bikes) and strength training equipment (e.g., weight machines, free weights) must comply with ISO 20957-1:2013 to ensure their products meet safety and performance standards.

2. Importers and Distributors

- Businesses that import or distribute fitness equipment may need to ensure that the products they handle are certified. This compliance assures their customers of the safety and reliability of the equipment.

3. Retailers of Fitness Equipment

- Retailers selling fitness equipment must ensure that the products they offer are certified to ISO 20957-1:2013. Certification helps build customer confidence in the quality and safety of the products they are purchasing.

4. Fitness Equipment Designers

- Organizations or individuals involved in the design of fitness equipment must adhere to the requirements of the standard during the design process to ensure safety and usability.

5. Fitness Facilities (Gyms, Health Clubs, etc.)

- Fitness facilities may seek ISO 20957-1:2013 certification for their equipment to demonstrate commitment to safety and quality. This certification can enhance their reputation and attract more customers.

6. Regulatory Bodies

- Government and regulatory bodies may require compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013 as part of their safety standards for fitness equipment to ensure public safety and product reliability.

7. Quality Assurance and Testing Laboratories

- Organizations providing testing and quality assurance services may need to align their practices with ISO 20957-1:2013 to ensure they meet industry standards in assessing fitness equipment.

Benefits of Certification

- Consumer Confidence: Certification provides assurance to consumers about the safety and quality of fitness equipment.

- Market Access: Compliance with ISO standards can facilitate access to markets that require certification as a prerequisite for sale.

- Risk Mitigation: Ensures that equipment is designed and manufactured with safety in mind, reducing the risk of accidents and injuries.

- Competitive Advantage: Certified companies can differentiate themselves from competitors by demonstrating a commitment to high standards.

In summary, ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is essential for manufacturers, importers, distributors, retailers, designers, fitness facilities, regulatory bodies, and testing laboratories involved in the fitness equipment industry.

When is required ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is typically required in several scenarios related to the production, distribution, and use of fitness equipment. Here are some key instances when certification is necessary:

1. Product Development Phase

- During Design and Manufacturing: Organizations should seek certification when developing new fitness equipment or modifying existing products to ensure compliance with safety and performance standards from the outset.

2. Market Entry

- Before Launching New Products: Companies intending to launch fitness equipment into the market often need certification to demonstrate that their products meet recognized safety standards, which is crucial for gaining market acceptance.

3. Regulatory Compliance

- In Response to Legal Requirements: Some jurisdictions may have legal or regulatory requirements mandating compliance with specific safety standards for fitness equipment. Certification may be necessary to meet these obligations.

4. Quality Assurance Programs

- As Part of Quality Management Systems: Organizations implementing a Quality Management System (QMS) may require certification to align with best practices in quality assurance and risk management for their fitness equipment.

5. Competitive Advantage

- To Differentiate in the Market: Companies may pursue certification to establish themselves as leaders in quality and safety within the fitness industry, particularly if their competitors are certified.

6. Insurance and Liability Considerations

- To Reduce Liability Risks: Obtaining certification can help organizations mitigate risks associated with product liability claims, as it demonstrates a commitment to safety and quality.

7. Consumer Demand

- In Response to Customer Expectations: Increasing consumer awareness and demand for safe and high-quality fitness products can drive companies to seek certification to meet customer expectations and build trust.

8. Post-Market Surveillance

- For Continuous Improvement: Organizations may pursue certification as part of ongoing efforts to monitor and improve product safety and performance, addressing any issues identified after the product launch.

9. Regular Reviews and Updates

- To Maintain Compliance: Organizations should routinely review their products and processes to ensure ongoing compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013, especially when significant changes are made to equipment design or manufacturing processes.

Conclusion

In summary, ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is required during various stages, including product development, market entry, compliance with regulatory standards, and as part of quality assurance efforts. It is crucial for organizations that wish to demonstrate their commitment to safety, quality, and customer satisfaction in the fitness equipment industry.

Where is required ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is required in various contexts related to fitness equipment across different regions and sectors. Here’s where this certification is typically necessary:

1. Manufacturing Facilities

- Production Plants: Manufacturers of fitness equipment need certification for their production facilities to ensure that the equipment produced meets safety and performance standards.

2. Retail Environments

- Fitness Equipment Retailers: Retail stores that sell fitness equipment should ensure that the products they offer are certified to provide assurance of safety and quality to their customers.

3. Fitness Facilities

- Gyms and Health Clubs: Fitness centers and gyms that use or sell fitness equipment may require certification for their machines to ensure compliance with safety standards, protecting users and enhancing their reputation.

4. Import and Export Businesses

- International Trade: Companies involved in the import and export of fitness equipment may need ISO 20957-1:2013 certification to meet the regulatory requirements of different countries and ensure that products comply with international safety standards.

5. Regulatory Compliance and Government Entities

- Regulatory Authorities: Government bodies that set safety and quality standards for consumer products may require ISO certification as part of their compliance framework for fitness equipment.

6. Testing and Certification Bodies

- Quality Assurance Organizations: Third-party testing and certification organizations often require compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013 to validate the safety and performance of fitness equipment before granting certification.

7. Insurance Companies

- Risk Assessment: Insurance providers may require fitness equipment manufacturers or facilities to have ISO certification to qualify for coverage, as it reduces liability risks associated with product failure.

8. Educational and Training Institutions

- Schools and Universities: Institutions offering fitness and sports programs may require certified equipment to ensure the safety of students and comply with educational standards.

9. Health and Safety Regulatory Bodies

- Occupational Health and Safety: Organizations focusing on occupational health may require certified fitness equipment to ensure compliance with workplace safety regulations.

10. Consumer Markets

- End Users: Increasingly, consumers demand certified products for personal use at home, driving retailers to source certified equipment.

Conclusion

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification is required across a wide range of settings, including manufacturing facilities, retail environments, fitness facilities, and regulatory compliance contexts. The certification helps ensure that fitness equipment is safe, reliable, and meets the necessary standards, benefitting manufacturers, consumers, and regulatory bodies alike.

How is required ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

Obtaining ISO 20957-1:2013 certification involves several systematic steps that organizations must follow to ensure compliance with the standard related to the safety and performance of fitness equipment. Here’s an overview of how this certification is required:

1. Understanding the Standard

- Familiarization: Organizations must first understand the requirements outlined in ISO 20957-1:2013. This includes knowledge of terminology, definitions, and the specific criteria for fitness equipment.

2. Gap Analysis

- Assessment: Conduct a gap analysis to identify any discrepancies between current practices and the requirements of the ISO standard. This helps determine areas needing improvement.

3. Management Commitment

- Leadership Involvement: Senior management must demonstrate commitment to achieving certification by providing resources, support, and setting a culture of quality and safety.

4. Quality Management System (QMS) Implementation

- Develop a QMS: Establish or modify a Quality Management System that aligns with the requirements of ISO 20957-1:2013. This includes documentation, procedures, and processes for quality assurance.

5. Documentation

- Record Keeping: Prepare necessary documentation, including quality manuals, procedures, work instructions, and records demonstrating compliance with the standard.

6. Training and Awareness

- Employee Training: Provide training to employees about the standard’s requirements, their roles in maintaining compliance, and the importance of quality and safety in fitness equipment.

7.Product Testing and Evaluation

- Compliance Testing: Conduct necessary tests on fitness equipment to ensure it meets the safety and performance criteria specified in the standard. This may include load testing, stability testing, and electrical safety assessments.

8.Internal Audits

- Regular Audits: Implement internal audits to evaluate the effectiveness of the QMS and ensure ongoing compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013. Identify areas for improvement and address any non-conformities.

9. Management Review

- Review Meetings: Conduct regular management reviews of the QMS to ensure it remains effective and relevant. This includes reviewing audit results, customer feedback, and the achievement of quality objectives.

10. Certification Body Selection

- Choose an Accredited Body: Select a reputable and accredited certification body to perform the certification audit. Ensure that the chosen body has experience in fitness equipment standards.

11.Certification Audit

- External Audit: The certification body will conduct an external audit to assess compliance with ISO 20957-1:2013. This includes reviewing documentation, interviewing staff, and observing processes and equipment.

12. Corrective Actions

- Address Findings: If any non-conformities are identified during the audit, organizations must take corrective actions to resolve these issues and improve processes.

13. Certification Issuance

- Receive Certification: Upon successful completion of the audit and resolution of any non-conformities, the certification body will issue ISO 20957-1:2013 certification.

14.Ongoing Compliance

- Surveillance Audits: After certification, organizations must undergo regular surveillance audits (typically annually) to maintain their certification status and demonstrate continued compliance.

Conclusion

In summary, obtaining ISO 20957-1:2013 certification requires a structured approach involving understanding the standard, implementing a Quality Management System, conducting training and audits, and engaging with an accredited certification body. This ensures that fitness equipment is manufactured and managed in compliance with international safety and performance standards.

Case Study on ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

Case Study: ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification for a Fitness Equipment Manufacturer

Company Background

Name: FitTech Solutions, Inc.
Industry: Manufacturing of Fitness Equipment
Location: New York, USA
Established: 2010
Employees: 150

FitTech Solutions, Inc. is a manufacturer of commercial-grade fitness equipment, including treadmills, stationary bikes, and strength training machines. The company has gained a strong market presence but has faced increased competition and consumer demand for safer and higher-quality products. To address these challenges and enhance its credibility, FitTech decided to pursue ISO 20957-1:2013 certification.

Step 1: Understanding the Standard

FitTech’s management formed a project team to study ISO 20957-1:2013, focusing on the safety and performance requirements for fitness equipment. They arranged workshops to familiarize their engineering and quality assurance teams with the standard’s criteria.

Step 2: Gap Analysis

The project team conducted a gap analysis comparing existing practices against the ISO requirements. They identified several areas needing improvement, including:

- Testing Procedures: Lack of formal testing protocols for equipment.

- Documentation: Insufficient records of product testing and quality checks.

- Training: Limited employee awareness of ISO standards and safety protocols.

Step 3: Management Commitment

FitTech’s CEO emphasized the importance of quality and safety in a company-wide meeting, reinforcing management’s commitment to achieving ISO certification. The company allocated a budget and resources for the project.

Step 4:QMS Implementation

The team established a Quality Management System (QMS) aligned with ISO 20957-1:2013 requirements, focusing on:

- Process Documentation: Developing procedures for equipment testing, production, and quality control.

- Quality Objectives: Setting measurable goals related to product safety and customer satisfaction.

Step 5: Documentation

The team created comprehensive documentation, including a quality manual, work instructions for equipment testing, and a record-keeping system for compliance evidence.

Step 6: Training and Awareness

FitTech implemented a training program for all employees on ISO standards and the importance of quality assurance. This included workshops, online courses, and hands-on training related to equipment safety and testing.

Step 7: Product Testing and Evaluation

The engineering team developed standardized testing procedures for all fitness equipment, including:

- Load Testing: Assessing the equipment’s durability under maximum weight conditions.

- Stability Testing: Ensuring equipment remains stable during use.

- Electrical Safety Testing: Verifying electrical components meet safety standards.

Step 8: Internal Audits

FitTech conducted regular internal audits to ensure compliance with the new processes and identify any non-conformities. The audits revealed a need for improved communication between departments, which was addressed through team meetings.

Step 9: Management Review

The management team held quarterly reviews of the QMS, analyzing audit results, customer feedback, and progress towards quality objectives. Adjustments were made as necessary to keep improving processes.

Step 10: Certification Body Selection

After preparing for certification, FitTech researched and selected a reputable accredited certification body with experience in fitness equipment standards.

Step 11: Certification Audit

The certification body conducted an external audit, which included:

- Document Review: Assessing compliance documentation.

- On-Site Evaluation: Observing production processes and product testing.

- Employee Interviews: Engaging with employees to gauge their understanding of quality practices.

Step 12: Corrective Actions

The audit identified minor non-conformities related to documentation practices. FitTech promptly addressed these by updating records and ensuring that all testing results were accurately documented.

Step 13: Certification Issuance

After successful resolution of non-conformities, FitTech received ISO 20957-1:2013 certification, enhancing its reputation and credibility in the market.

Step 14:Ongoing Compliance

FitTech scheduled annual surveillance audits with the certification body to maintain compliance and continuously improve its QMS and product safety measures.

Conclusion

Achieving ISO 20957-1:2013 certification allowed FitTech Solutions, Inc. to enhance its product safety and quality, leading to increased customer trust and market competitiveness. The company’s commitment to continuous improvement and adherence to international standards positioned it favorably in the evolving fitness equipment industry.

This case study illustrates the importance of a structured approach to certification and highlights the benefits of implementing quality management practices aligned with recognized international standards.

White Paper on ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

Executive Summary

ISO 20957-1:2013 is an international standard that outlines the requirements for the safety and performance of fitness equipment. As the fitness industry continues to evolve, ensuring the quality and safety of fitness equipment has become paramount. This white paper discusses the significance of ISO 20957-1:2013 certification, its requirements, benefits, and implementation strategies for manufacturers and organizations in the fitness sector.

Introduction

The global fitness industry has witnessed exponential growth, with increased awareness of health and wellness driving demand for high-quality fitness equipment. To maintain competitiveness and meet customer expectations, manufacturers must adhere to stringent safety and performance standards. ISO 20957-1:2013 provides a framework for ensuring that fitness equipment is designed, manufactured, and tested to meet rigorous safety and performance criteria.

Understanding ISO 20957-1:2013

ISO 20957-1:2013 specifies requirements related to the safety, performance, and test methods of fitness equipment, including:

1. Scope: The standard applies to fitness equipment for use in commercial and home environments, covering various types, such as cardiovascular machines, strength training devices, and more.

1. Definitions: It provides clear definitions of key terms related to fitness equipment and testing procedures.

1. Safety Requirements: Specifies safety criteria to prevent injuries during the use of fitness equipment.

1. Performance Requirements: Outlines performance benchmarks that equipment must meet to ensure reliability and effectiveness.

1. Testing Procedures: Describes methods for testing equipment to validate compliance with safety and performance criteria.

Importance of ISO 20957-1:2013 Certification

1.Enhances Product Safety

Certification to ISO 20957-1:2013 ensures that fitness equipment meets safety requirements, minimizing the risk of accidents and injuries.

2.Improves Product Quality

Compliance with the standard leads to improved design and manufacturing processes, resulting in higher quality fitness equipment.

3. Builds Customer Trust

ISO certification serves as a reliable indicator of quality and safety, enhancing customer confidence in the brand.

4.Facilitates Market Access

Many markets and retailers require certification as a prerequisite for selling fitness equipment, thus broadening the market reach for certified products.

5. Promotes Continuous Improvement

The certification process encourages organizations to adopt a culture of continuous improvement in their operations and product offerings.

Key Requirements for Certification

Organizations seeking ISO 20957-1:2013 certification must fulfill several critical requirements:

1. Establish a Quality Management System (QMS)

Implement a QMS that aligns with ISO standards, focusing on documenting processes, setting quality objectives, and ensuring continual improvement.

2. Conduct a Gap Analysis

Evaluate existing practices against ISO 20957-1:2013 requirements to identify areas needing improvement.

3. Develop Testing Protocols

Create standardized testing procedures for equipment to ensure compliance with safety and performance requirements.

4. Training and Awareness

Provide training for employees on ISO standards, safety protocols, and quality assurance practices to ensure a unified approach to compliance.

5. Internal Audits

Conduct regular internal audits to assess compliance with the established QMS and identify non-conformities.

6. Engage a Certification Body

Select a reputable certification body to perform the certification audit, ensuring they are accredited and experienced in fitness equipment standards.

Implementation Strategy

1. Management Commitment

Leadership must demonstrate commitment to ISO certification by providing necessary resources and fostering a culture of quality.

2. Team Formation

Assemble a cross-functional team responsible for overseeing the certification process, including representatives from engineering, quality assurance, and operations.

3. Documentation Development

Create and maintain comprehensive documentation to support compliance efforts, including quality manuals, testing procedures, and training records.

4. Monitor Progress

Establish performance metrics to track progress towards certification, ensuring timely completion of necessary activities.

Conclusion

ISO 20957-1:2013 certification represents a critical step for fitness equipment manufacturers seeking to enhance product safety, quality, and marketability. By adhering to this standard, organizations can not only improve their operational practices but also build trust with customers and stakeholders. The commitment to quality assurance and continuous improvement fostered by the certification process positions companies favorably in a competitive landscape, ultimately contributing to the overall advancement of the fitness industry.

Recommendations

Organizations aiming for ISO 20957-1:2013 certification should consider the following recommendations:

1. Invest in Training: Ensure employees are well-informed about ISO standards and their importance in the quality assurance process.

1. Engage Stakeholders: Involve all relevant stakeholders in the certification process to gain diverse perspectives and foster collaboration.

1. Leverage Technology: Utilize software tools for documentation and audit management to streamline the certification process and maintain compliance.

1. Review Regularly: Conduct regular reviews of processes and standards to adapt to changes in regulations or industry practices.

By implementing these strategies, organizations can effectively pursue ISO 20957-1:2013 certification, enhancing their products and contributing to a safer and more reliable fitness equipment market.

Safety Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster
^ safety | Etymology of safety by etymonline
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Charles G. Oakes, PhD, Blue Ember Technologies, LLC.“Safety versus Security in Fire Protection Planning Archived 2012-03-13 at the Wayback Machine,”The American Institute of Architects: Knowledge Communities, May 2009. Retrieved on June 22, 2011.
^ Neumann, Ann (February 2019). “Going to Extremes”. Harper’s Magazine. ISSN 0017-789X. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
^ “Proven Safety Countermeasures: Roundabouts”. Federal Highway Administration. Archived from the original on 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2012-08-13.
^ Jeroen Johan de Hartog; Hanna Boogaard; Hans Nijland; Gerard Hoek (1 August 2010). “Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks?”. Environmental Health Perspectives. 118 (8): 1109–1116. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901747. PMC 2920084. PMID 20587380.
^ Stotz, Tamara; Bearth, Angela; Ghelfi, Signe Maria; Siegrist, Michael (May 2022). “The perceived costs and benefits that drive the acceptability of risk-based security screenings at airports”. Journal of Air Transport Management. 100: 102183. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102183. hdl:20.500.11850/531027.
^ Buchan, John C.; Thiel, Cassandra L.; Steyn, Annalien; Somner, John; Venkatesh, Rengaraj; Burton, Matthew J.; Ramke, Jacqeline (June 2022). “Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review”. The Lancet Planetary Health. 6 (6): e524–e534. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00074-2. PMID 35709809.
^ “Operational safety definition”. www.lawinsider.com. Retrieved 16 August 2024.
^ “Scopus preview – Scopus – Safety Science”. www.scopus.com. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ “Scopus preview – Scopus – Journal of Safety Research”. www.scopus.com. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ “Aims and scope – Safety Science | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier”. www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ Rheinland, TÜV. “Pressure Vessel Inspection According to ASME”. tuv.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2017. Retrieved 2 May 2018.
^ “Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTLs) – Occupational Safety and Health Administration”. www.osha.gov. Archived from the original on 8 April 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_testing
“ISTQB Standard glossary of terms used in Software Testing”.
^ Moradi, Mehrdad; Van Acker, Bert; Vanherpen, Ken; Denil, Joachim (2019). Chamberlain, Roger; Taha, Walid; Törngren, Martin (eds.). “Model-Implemented Hybrid Fault Injection for Simulink (Tool Demonstrations)”. Cyber Physical Systems. Model-Based Design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 11615. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 71–90. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23703-5_4. ISBN 978-3-030-23703-5. S2CID 195769468.
^ “Optimizing fault injection in FMI co-simulation through sensitivity partitioning | Proceedings of the 2019 Summer Simulation Conference”. dl.acm.org: 1–12. 22 July 2019. Retrieved 2020-06-15.
^ Moradi, Mehrdad, Bentley James Oakes, Mustafa Saraoglu, Andrey Morozov, Klaus Janschek, and Joachim Denil. “Exploring Fault Parameter Space Using Reinforcement Learning-based Fault Injection.” (2020).
“Certification”. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Feb 27, 2024.
^ “Glossary of Important Assessment and Measurement Terms”. NCME. Archived from the original on 2017-07-22. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
^ Cem Kaner (Mar 26, 2014). “Why propose an advanced certification in software testing?”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ “Academic Degrees Abbreviations”. Abbreviations.com. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
^ “Motion Picture Association of America”. mpaa.org. Archived from the original on Dec 30, 2011.
^ International standards and private standards. International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISBN 978-92-67-10518-5. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023 – via DocPlayer.
^ “Attestations of conformity”. CASCO. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Nov 30, 2023.
^ “U.S. Conformity Assessment System: 3rd Party Conformity Assessment”. ANSI Standards Portal. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Certifying Software Testers Worldwide – ISTQB® International Software Testing Qualifications Board”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ “International Institute for Software Testing (IIST) CSTP & CTM Informational Home Page”. Testinginstitute.com. Retrieved January 30, 2014.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_compliance#:~:text=Regulatory%20compliance%20describes%20the%20goal,laws%2C%20policies%2C%20and%20regulations.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust
“Framework 2: Implementation Stages | NIRN”. nirn.fpg.unc.edu. National Implementation Research Network. Archived from the original on 2022-05-23. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
^ Chomutare, T; Tejedor, M; Svenning, TO; Marco-Ruiz, L; Tayefi, M; Lind, K; Godtliebsen, F; Moen, A; Ismail, L; Makhlysheva, A; Ngo, PD (2022). “Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare: A Theory-Based Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (23): 16359. doi:10.3390/ijerph192316359. PMC 9738234. PMID 36498432.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Laudon, K., & Laudon, J. (2010). “Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm.” Eleventh Edition (11 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
^ Suchman, Lucy (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521337397.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_Fitness
“Market Access”. Investopedia.com.
^ Kang, Jong Woo (2015). “The Noodle Bowl Effect: Stumbling or Building Block?” (PDF). ADB Economics Working Paper Series (446) – via Asian Development Bank.
^ Van den Bossche, Peter; Prévost, Denise (2016). Essentials of WTO Law. Cambridge University Press.
^ Van den Bossche, Peter (2003). “Dispute Settlement – World Trade Organization” (PDF). UNCTAD.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade” (PDF). WTO. 1994.
^ Elsig, Manfred and Klotz, Sebastian (2017). “Behind-the-Border Measures and the New Generation of Trade Agreements: TBT and SPS Compared” (PDF). WTI Working Paper No. 03/2017.
^ “Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade” (PDF). WTO. 1994.
^ “Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures” (PDF). WTO. 1994.
^ “Agreement on Trade Facilitation”. WTO. 2017.
^ “Most-Favored-Nation Treatment Principle” (PDF). METI. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
^ “Decision of 28 November 1979 (The Enabling Clause)”. WTO.
^ “Preferential Rules of Origin for Least-Developed Countries”. WTO. 2013.
^ McGuire, Greg (2002). “Trade in Services – Market Access Opportunities and the Benefits of Liberalization for Developing Economies” (PDF). Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 19: 4. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
^ “General Agreement on Trade in Services” (PDF). WTO. 1994.
^ “Guide to Reading the GATS Schedules of Specific Commitments and the List of Article II (MFN) Exemptions”. WTO.
^ Zhou, Nianli (2014). “How Do the “GATS-Plus” and “GATS-Minus” Characteristics of Regional Service Agreements Affect Trade in Services?”. NBER Working Paper No. 20551. October 2014 – via National Bureau of Economic Research.
^ Milton, Ayoki (2015). “The GATS and Regional Approaches to Services Trade and Investment Liberalisation”. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 91118 – via MPRA.
^ Gent, S., and Skeldon, R., GATS Mode 4: How Trade in Services Can Help Developing Countries,Development Research Centre on Migration, Globalisation & Poverty at the University of Sussex, Briefing No. 4, published November 2005, accessed 29 June 2023
“Mitigation”. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d “Beyond the Basics: Best Practices in Local Mitigation Planning: Introduction”. cisa.gov.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “About Disaster Mitigation”. Public Safety Canada. December 21, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
^ “Mitigation”. dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
McNeil JJ, Piccenna L, Ronaldson K, et al. (2010). “The Value of Patient-Centred Registries in Phase IV Drug Surveillance”. Pharm Med. 24 (5): 281–288. doi:10.1007/bf03256826. S2CID 19091146. Archived from the original on 2012-07-07. Retrieved 2011-06-17.
^ “Post-marketing Pharmacosurveillance in Canada”. Health Canada. 2005. Archived from the original on 2010-09-28. Retrieved 2010-07-27.
^ IVDR – 2017/746
^ Zippel, Claus; Bohnet-Joschko, Sabine (2017). “Post market surveillance in the german medical device sector – current state and future perspectives”. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 121 (8): 880–886. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.005. ISSN 1872-6054. PMID 28697849.
^ “Post-Market Surveillance and Vigilance: MDR vs IVDR”. citemedical.com. 10 May 2022.
^ MDCG Guideline 2023-3
^ “Post-marketing Surveillance”. U.S. FDA/CDER. 2004.
^ “Post-Approval Studies”. U.S. FDA/CDRH. 2014.
^ “522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies”. U.S. FDA/CDRH. 2014.
^ FDA (3 November 2018). “Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments: Introduction”. Food and Drug Administration.
“Certification”. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Feb 27, 2024.
^ “Glossary of Important Assessment and Measurement Terms”. NCME. Archived from the original on 2017-07-22. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
^ Cem Kaner (Mar 26, 2014). “Why propose an advanced certification in software testing?”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ “Academic Degrees Abbreviations”. Abbreviations.com. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
^ “Motion Picture Association of America”. mpaa.org. Archived from the original on Dec 30, 2011.
^ International standards and private standards. International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISBN 978-92-67-10518-5. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023 – via DocPlayer.
^ “Attestations of conformity”. CASCO. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Nov 30, 2023.
^ “U.S. Conformity Assessment System: 3rd Party Conformity Assessment”. ANSI Standards Portal. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Certifying Software Testers Worldwide – ISTQB® International Software Testing Qualifications Board”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
^ “International Institute for Software Testing (IIST) CSTP & CTM Informational Home Page”. Testinginstitute.com. Retrieved January 30, 2014.